EUAICheck is an educational simulator. We are not a law firm and have no affiliation with any official body.
EUAICheck is an independent educational simulator. This content is informational and does not constitute legal advice.

EU AI Act and GDPR: two distinct regulations that apply together

Updated: September 2026 - Sources: CNIL, European Commission

The EU AI Act does not replace the GDPR. Both texts coexist and apply simultaneously when an AI system processes personal data - which is the case for the vast majority of enterprise AI systems.

Contents

  1. Fundamental differences
  2. Common points
  3. Comparison table
  4. The role of the CNIL
  5. Managing dual compliance

A common misconception: some companies think their GDPR compliance covers them for the EU AI Act. This is not the case. The two regulations have different objects, different authorities, different documents and different penalties. They can apply cumulatively, but Article 99(8) of the EU AI Act prevents double penalties for the same violation.

1. Fundamental differences

2. Common points

RGPDEU AI Act
ObjectPersonal dataAI systems
TriggerProcessing personal dataDeploying an AI system in the EU
Max fine20M EUR ou 4% CA35M EUR ou 7% CA
FR authorityCNILCNIL (depuis fev. 2026)
Key documentRegistre des traitementsDocumentation technique Annexe IV

3. The role of the CNIL

In France, the CNIL was designated as the national competent authority for the EU AI Act in February 2026 by decree. It is therefore the supervisory authority for both the GDPR and the EU AI Act. The CNIL published guidelines in March 2026 on the relationship between the two texts, clarifying in particular:

4. Managing dual compliance effectively

Is your AI system compliant with both regulations?

Start the simulator

Sources

EU AI Act and chatbotsGPAI